This is the forth post in a series on feminism. Check out parts one, two, & three.
Just over a year ago, I interviewed thirteen Christian women about their understandings of faith, gender, and feminism for my senior thesis sociology research.
Although the research was a requirement for my undergraduate degree, it was a perfect opportunity for me to explore my own tensions surrounding faith, gender identity, and social norms through the experiences of others.
To be completely honest, I began this research wanting to further reaffirm my own beliefs about women’s full inclusion in church life and leadership. My formative years at Scripps College had forged a strong feminist identity in me, and my coursework in sociology gave me a foundational knowledge of gender construction and practice.
Although I was (and continue to be) committed to conducting my interviews in ways that limit the influence of my personal bias as much as possible, I was afraid to possibly hear women agree with traditional narratives about gender and women’s roles. What would I do if they voluntarily embraced a worldview I thought was limited and damaging? How would I interpret their stories?
However, as I began to conduct my interviews, I slowly began to release this fear of being on the wrong side of the “gender fence” as I opened myself up to the women I spoke with. The stories that they offered me were varied; stories of hurt and discrimination stood alongside narratives of empowered leadership and choices of willing submission.
Each woman was a complex mosaic of experience, theology, and context that I could not reduce to a simplistic sociological theory or theological tradition.
The more data I gathered, the more I began to realize that a “right-wrong” dichotomy is not always a helpful way to approach our understanding of gender. Instead, I’ve come to understand gender as a tool that we use to organize our experience, influence our behavior, and create meaning.
Since this was a formative experience for me personally, academically, and spiritually, I’m thankful for the opportunity to share my findings and reflections with you here. Below you’ll find a few points that have continued to impact me long after my formal interviews ended.
Here are four things I have found to be true about Jesus Feminism:
1. Self-definition is a Powerful Tool
When you consider that church, mainstream culture, and the feminist movement often have very different approaches to understanding gender, it’s not surprising that figuring out our own views on the topic can be confusing.
One of the main findings from my research was that the Christian women I interviewed actively created their own definitions of feminism and what it means to be a Christian woman. This act of self-definition was so powerful because it allowed these women to find cohesiveness across various identities and beliefs. This became especially apparent when I asked my participants if they identified as feminist and to define feminism.
Most of the women I interviewed did identify as feminist, but there were often a laundry list of conditions attached to that identity. For example: “…but I don’t hate men”, “…but I don’t think men and women are exactly the same”, or “Well, I consider myself a Jesus Feminist”. Since Christian theology (loosely categorized) and feminism have been often presented as opposites in the cultural landscape, this act of self-definition allows both identities to be embraced.
2. Gender Inequality Cannot be Separated From Other Forms of Oppression
One of the largest flaws in my research was that the women I interviewed were almost exclusively white, highly educated, and generally came from middle-upper class backgrounds. Although it was more comfortable for me to interview these women because I shared a lot in common with them, it allowed me to to prioritize gender over other issues of inequality.
In sharing their backgrounds, I only once heard a participant share an experience of discrimination that wasn’t exclusively gender-based. There are so many women (past and present) who have offered their experiences, theologies, prayers, and critiques to the world, and it would be a shame if we miss opportunities to learn from them because we only choose to listen to others who are similar to us.
3. Living with Contradictions
Another key finding from this research is that there are almost always inconsistencies between our intellectual understanding of gender, our theology of gender, and the way we live our lives. During my interviews I noticed that participants would quickly reject ideas about gender that they found offensive or biblically unsupported, but they simultaneously embraced gendered ideas they found comfortable, positive, or even romantic.
For example, most of the women I interviewed were strongly supportive of women holding church leadership roles, but several of those women also had highly gendered expectations for romantic relationships. Since gender is such a fundamental way that we organize our personal and social lives, it’s not surprising that our “gender rules” are flexible in these different contexts.
These contradictions exist because our survival largely depends on our ability to “play along” to the norms and rules that govern our culture. As someone who also experiences these gender contradictions in my day-to-day life, I feel obligated to enter into areas of tension, but I also recognize the need to give myself grace as I explore both the boundaries and possibilities that I find. (However, check out this article from Tim Peck for some practical ways to avoid undermining your theology of gender!)
4. It Often Takes Something Big to Change our Views
As you have probably guessed, I really love talking to women about gender, faith, and feminism. For almost all of the women I’ve talked with who strongly believe in egalitarianism and a feminist hermeneutic, there was some tipping point in their lives that made them reconsider their understandings.
Even though theology can (and should, I think) play a large role in shaping our views, our lived practice of those beliefs is often the compass that we use to lead us into the future. The women that I interviewed who held more traditional views of gender generally had positive experiences of complementarian relationships and gender-dictated roles.
This is also true for me; I didn’t even begin to reconsider my views about gender roles until I realized that the model wasn’t working in my relationship anymore, and was ultimately causing more tension and confusion for us. Although I don’t always agree with others about their views on these topics, I deeply respect that their beliefs, like mine, are deeply rooted and are not going to be easily overturned.
These findings are just a small window into my experiences with this research, and I hope for more opportunities to learn about the nuanced ways that faith, feminism, and gender shape and influence our world. Wherever you’re at in this journey, thank you for letting me be a part of it—and let’s keep pushing forward together!
———————-
If you’re interested in downloading a PDF of my senior thesis, you can find it here: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/459/
P.S. There are a lot of things I didn’t have space to include or could have talked about for much longer, so if you have a question leave it in the comments or feel free to send me an email me at [email protected]!
9 Comments
As long as men feel entitled to dominance there will be violence against women, increasingly as they feel the ground begin to move beneath them. These days, women need to be very circumspect in dealing with men who they sense are threatened by feminist-like behaviour. Rule #1. If the church has no women in leadership, get out. This church leadership probably considers women incapable, unacceptable, and possibly even dangerous.
One church like this had men’s meetings but forbade women to meet “because women gossip”. (Have you ever been the lone woman and listened to the men gossip fervently? They put women to shame!)
The solution…women must join hands and stand strong together. Frankly, even though female preachers are not always the answer, I believe, in the right circumstances, a compassionate, female or even male, SERVANT leader is the answer for rescuing abused women…for example: Kathy Escobar “lifting heads, straightening backs”. http://kathyescobar.com/2015/03/03/lifting-heads-straightening-backs/
Thankfully, the number of men who are fully accepting of women in leadership is growing exponentially while the nay sayers are getting fewer and more strident (see Matt Slick for a man who is doing something against female pastors…and be warned. He describes women like us as “bitter” about what God made us to be…
Au contraire! I am glad how God made us to be…but bitter about the thousands of dollars I gave over the years to support churches like his and support the erroneous teaching about the heart of God toward women…and the errors about what Godly women have really been like throughout the Bible.
The Bible has the truth about God and women…sadly many churches do not.
Judy, thanks for taking the time to comment! As an editor here I am well aware of Matt Slick’s very unkind rhetoric and because of that, I’m removing his link from your comment. Just don’t want to send him any web traffic from our site.
Your comment about wishing you hadn’t given so much money to churches that don’t allow women in leadership is intriguing, especially in light of the fact that women control over 80% of household spending here in the U.S. Hmm….
Megan, thank you for this article and for sharing your heart! I believe that we are all on a journey of discovering God and who we truly are as individuals. I don’t proclaim to have all of the answers when it comes to the topic of gender and faith, but I love the conversation! It is so refreshing that there is a platform to exchange ideas and to atleast question some of the messages that I’ve been told all my life. I love this site!!!
Congratulations on this article and your thesis. Something similar is happening in the Catholic and Orthodox churches, but the patriarchal resistance is much greater due to our sacramental theology.
Just in case you might be interested, I think there is hope. Based on the Catechism of the Catholic Church and John Paul II’s Theology of the Body, my understanding is that the ordination of women to the priesthood would be in perfect continuity with apostolic tradition:
Ordination of Women in the Sacramental Churches
http://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv11n03supp6.html#section9
This is not about what women (or men) want. This is about discerning what Christ wants for the Church in the 21st century, for the glory of God and the good of souls. Would Jesus, in today’s world, choose 12 males to represent the patriarchs of the 12 tribes of Israel?
Hi Luis!
Thank you for sharing these seeds of hope in the Catholic and Orthodox churches. In the link you shared I particularly resonated with the significance of God becoming flesh vs. male. I think the significance of the incarnation is not that God came as a gendered male, but that God decided to fully embody the humanity we experience. If you’re not already familiar with the work of Elizabeth Johnson, a Catholic theologian, I would definitely recommend reading her work “She Who Is”–it was a foundational text in shifting my understanding of gender within the Trinity.
Thank you Megan for giving us a taste of your conclusions and the chance to read your paper. I so agree with Luis’ response, having researched the Catholic issues, as have a number of my students. I also agree with your response to him. When men and women know what feminism and feminist means, how can they not sign up? Advocate it? Find out what to do for women around the world! Sadly, violence against women continues and even is increasing across God’s creation.