An argument often brought up in discussions about women in church leadership is that Jesus’ twelve apostles were all male, and, because there were no females among the Twelve, this means that women cannot be church leaders.
This argument is usually countered with the fact that, as well as no women, there were also no Gentiles among the Twelve, so if we genuinely want to use the Twelve as a paradigm of people suitable for church leadership we should restrict leaders to Jewish men.
I find neither of these arguments useful in discussions on church leadership because they miss a critical point: Jesus’ earthly ministry occurred before the Church was in existence.
Jesus’ ministry occurred at a vital juncture between the Old Testament and the New Covenant – between “Israel only” and the inclusive, universal Church. The New Covenant had not yet been inaugurated when the Twelve were called. And so, at that time and at that place (Israel), Jesus chose twelve Jewish men to be his first disciples.
The Old Testament, Israel, and Patriarchy
There are a few reasons why Jesus chose twelve Jewish men to be his chief disciples. Jesus’ healing and teaching ministry was directed primarily to the Jewish people within Israel (Matt. 15:24); and for Jesus to be recognized as a Rabbi he needed to have at least ten male disciples. With twelve Jewish male disciples, Jesus’ status as a Rabbi was never questioned, even by his critics.
There is an obvious symbolism with the number twelve. Jesus himself makes a connection between the twelve disciples and the twelve tribes of Israel (Matt. 19:28; Luke 22:29-30). Jesus may have chosen twelve as a way of showing that his message, ministry, and New Covenant was for all of Israel. When Judas died, his place was filled to keep the number of the apostles at twelve. But once the New Covenant had been inaugurated, and when the church age began with the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, and as more and more Gentiles joined the church, the significance of the Twelve was no longer relevant. After the death of James (Acts 12:1-2) there was no attempt to replace him in order to keep the number of apostles at twelve.
Jesus chose Judas Iscariot to be one of the original Twelve, presumably knowing that Judas would later betray him (John 6:64, 70-71). Since Judas Iscariot was one of the Twelve, this makes the argument untenable that Jesus intended the Twelve to be some sort of precedent or paradigm for church leadership. The fact that one of the Twelve later betrayed Jesus and never became a church leader is an important point to consider. But there are other factors to consider in the argument that the all-male Twelve means that women cannot be church leaders.
The Twelve assisted with Jesus’ healing and teaching ministry to the Israelites (Matt. 10:5-6 cf 15:24). It is inconceivable that the Jewish people would have accepted ministry from Gentiles. And due to the poor status of women, there would have been considerable difficulties for Jewish people to accept healing and instruction from women. Jesus began his earthly ministry while the Old Covenant was still operative; and the curses of the Fall, which included the rule of men over women, were still in effect (cf Gen. 3:16b).
Nevertheless, while there were no women among the Twelve, there may have been a few Jewish women among the seventy-two (Luke 10:1ff). And we know that women traveled with Jesus and the Twelve and supported the ministry from their own resources (Luke 8:1-3). Many women were among the most faithful of Jesus’ disciples.
The New Covenant, the Church, and the Holy Spirit
Once Jesus had fulfilled all the requirements of the Old Testament with his death and resurrection, the old rules and restrictions became obsolete. No longer were disciples to be only Jewish. Jesus commissioned his disciples to make more disciples from every nation (Matt. 28:19 cf Acts 9:36). These other disciples included Gentiles and women.
Gilbert Bilezikian has pointed out that:
“The great paradigm shift from old to new covenant did not occur at the beginning of Christ’s earthly ministry but at its end (1 Cor. 11:25). History turned upon itself with the death and resurrection of Christ and with the subsequent coming of the Spirit at Pentecost. The first utterance made immediately after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit concerned a radical change in ministry roles. With the apostles at his side, Peter formally proclaimed that, because of the new era inaugurated by the coming of the Spirit, ministries that had been previously restricted were now universally accessible to all believers without distinctions of gender, age, or class.”
Jesus treated women with a degree of dignity, intelligence, association, and genuine brotherly love that was rare in those times. True equality would have to wait for Pentecost, however, when the Holy Spirit was poured out for the first time on all believers regardless of gender.
Apostles, Pastors, or Priests?
The Twelve Apostles were all male, but most of these men did not function as local pastors or local church leaders. They were apostles – itinerant missionaries with a leadership function. The argument that women cannot be pastors of churches because the Twelve Apostles were all male is illogical. Being a pastor and being an apostle are not the same thing.
Having said that, we do have the example of a New Testament woman who was an apostle – Junia (Rom. 16:7). Moreover, the New Testament gives us several examples of women who functioned in various leadership ministries in the early church, including being pastors and leaders of house churches.
Some denominations teach that the Apostles functioned as priests and that subsequent church leaders also function as priests. Under the New Covenant, however, there is only one priest – Jesus Christ our High Priest and Mediator. There is no need for any other mediator between God and his people (1 Tim. 2:5). The New Testament never refers to apostles or any other church leader as priests.
All Christians are agents of Jesus Christ by virtue of his Holy Spirit who lives within us, and we are all members of a royal priesthood. As members of this priesthood we are called to collectively, and individually, proclaim the gospel to those who have not heard.
The fact that the Twelve Apostles were all male cannot be used to bar women from leadership ministries for several reasons. Jesus called the Twelve before the New Covenant had been inaugurated and before the Holy Spirit had come on all believers. He chose the Twelve to help with his ministry to Israel within a certain cultural context. The fact that Judas was one of the Twelve means that Jesus must have chosen at least some of the Twelve for reasons other than church leadership. The “Male Apostle” argument cannot be taken to mean that women cannot be pastors or evangelists, etc. It might be taken to mean that women cannot be apostles; however, the example of Junia as an apostle makes even this argument untenable. Moreover, Jesus never stated that only men could be leaders. Jesus’ only instructions about church leadership are that those who lead in the Christian community should be servants, not rulers. The fact that Jesus’ Twelve Apostles were all male is not a valid premise to exclude godly and gifted women from any kind of ministry function or role in the Church.
Click here for a Spanish translation of this post.
 The Twelve are only infrequently referred to as apostles in the gospels: “only once in Matthew and Mark, not at all in John, and five times in Luke . . . Many scholars [e.g. W. Schmithals (1969:98-110)] in fact argue that Jesus did not at any time call the twelve ‘apostles’ during his lifetime.” Kevin Giles poses the question, “Did Luke introduce the title ‘apostle’ in his role as editor of the historical sources he used, or was it already there?” Patterns of Ministry Among the First Christians by Kevin Giles (Collins Dove, 1989) p. 155, 157.
 “To the present day among orthodox Jews the quorum for a synagogue congregation is ten free men; unless ten such males are present the service cannot begin.” F.F. Bruce
 Tabitha (Dorcas) is a woman identified as a disciple (Acts 9:36ff).
Jesus discipled women. Mary of Bethany sat at Jesus’ feet – the posture and position of a disciple – listening to his teaching. Jesus said that “few things are needed—or indeed only one. Mary has chosen what is better, and it will not be taken away from her.” (Luke 10:42.)
 New Testament women who were involved in leadership ministries:  Priscilla (with her husband Aquila) (Acts 18:26; Rom. 16:3-5, etc), Chloe (1 Cor. 1:11), Nympha (Col. 4:15), Apphia (with Philemon and Archippus) (Phlm. 2), “the chosen lady” (2 John 1) and “the chosen sister” (2 John 13), were all house church leaders mentioned in the New Testament.
Philip’s daughters (Acts 21:9), Phoebe (Rom. 16:1-2), Junia (Rom. 16:7), Euodia and Syntyche (Phil. 4:2-3) and probably Lydia (Acts 16:40), plus others were New Testament women with significant Christian ministries and which probably included house church leadership. Just as there have been good and bad male leaders, there were good and bad female leaders. Sadly, the church in Thyatira was being corrupted by the teachings and false prophecies of a wicked and immoral female leader (Rev. 2:20-24), as was the church in Ephesus (1 Tim. 1:3-4 cf 2:12). [My series on 1 Timothy 2:12 in Context here.]
 There is no real evidence that Peter was the first leader (bishop) of the church at Rome; or that the ministry of being a “priest” is passed on from minister to minister (apostolic succession) beginning with Peter. Peter makes no mention, or hint, about apostolic succession in his letters, nor does he state that he was the first bishop of Rome.
 Paul refers to his ministry as “priestly” once; but he says this in the context of proclaiming Christ to the Gentiles – to those who do not know him (Rom. 15:16 cf 15:20). Christians should rely primarily on God, and not a person, for their forgiveness, comfort, and guidance, etc. I do not believe that church leaders are called to represent Christ to people who already know him.
 Kevin Giles makes this point in his excellent study guide Better Together, and adds that this rule is stated seven times in the gospels: Matthew 20:26-28; 23:11; Mark 9:35; 10:43-45; Luke 9:48; 22:27. Furthermore, Jesus demonstrated this rule in John 13:4-20. (Better Together, Acorn Press, 2010, page 8.)
Why Jesus Chose Male Apostles from Community 101, p74-80, by Gilbert Bilezikian.
Why Were All the Apostle Men? by Joseph Tkach.
This post was originally published on Margaret Mowczko’s website.
Art Credit – Veneziano, “Christ Rescuing Peter”
Thanks Margaret for this thoughtful piece
I recently read this article, which gives some examples of sources that refer to women who were deacons and elders in the early church. Fascinating stuff! http://www.cbeinternational.org/resources/article/early-evidence-women-officers-church
I have heard several debates on this topic and most of them end with the fact that the description of elders(as having one wife). The debate centers around that if a senior pastor is the lead elder then a woman can not be a senior pastor. I have been asked to show scripture that defines an elder as anything but a man, but I am at a loss. I know of many great women in ministry like Beth Moore, Christine Caine and so on, but have been told that they all are not senior pastors even though they have ministry roles.
Luis, Marg has an article that specifically addresses that issue here: http://newlife.id.au/equality-and-gender-issues/pauls-qualifications-for-church-leaders/. For a longer interpretation, see Philip B. Payne’s book – Man and Woman: One in Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Paul’s Letters. I think you would really enjoy this book – it is a classic.
Those kinds of passages are also used against unmarried people. Even un-married men who want to work in a leadership position are not permitted to do so, because many churches have a prejudice that single and childless people (unmarried women as well as men) are not as qualified, trustworthy, or capable.
I don’t see the text as indicating that one must be married with children to serve, but such verses are often interpreted in that manner.
It’s very sad and frustrating to see how so many Christians and denominations refuse to allow people who want to serve to serve and use their talents… they keep excluding people on the basis of gender and/or marital status, and I do not see a biblical grounds for either one.
Es un comentario muy bien hecho. Felicitaciones. Gracias!!!
Muchas gracias, Olga!
Thanks, this is logically laid out and I appreciate it. Have heard the “all male apostles so women can’t be [whatever church role is under discussion]” so many times. This is refreshingly straightforward and biblically internally consistent.